The Fifth Wave–Rick Yancey (May 2013)

*NOTE–I read an advance uncorrected proof of The Fifth Wave.  It was released on May 5th.*16101128

First, they wiped out the electrical grid.  Next, the oceans rose and destroyed the coasts.  Then came plague–the Red Death.  Finally, the Silencers.  What do the Others have planned for the 5th Wave?  Cassie Sullivan doesn’t know; she doesn’t even know if there are any other humans left to fight with her.  But what she does know is that if her little brother Sammy is alive, she must do everything she can to fulfill her promise and find him.

Thoughts– As I said on FB yesterday, HOLY SMOKES.  When I got to the end of The Fifth Wave, I felt such relief–not because I didn’t like it or I was in such a hurry to get to the end, but because I was so tense the entire time I was reading.  The tautness of this sci-fi/thriller is incredible; I read the entire last 2/3 of the book in one sitting and when I finished, I shut the cover and just sat there for a moment trying to relax.  Yancey’s plot moves along at a rapid fire pace, and you care so much about the fate of the characters that you just turn the pages as fast as you can. (I know some of you are all, “Lauren, I know you flipped to the end.  YOU ALWAYS DO.  And it’s true; I did…but honestly, it didn’t slow me down much this time around!)

I was really surprised by how emotional I felt during my reading; maybeit was getting to see the story from the different main characters’ POVs as Yancey alternates between three or four different narrators/perspectives, maybe it was that I was just so worried about 5 year old Sammy because I kept thinking of my 5 year old, or maybe it was that the book is just that good, but I felt like I was on the verge of tears the entire time.  I don’t typically read a lot of sci-fi (Ender’s Game and Ender’s Shadow being the exception) and I didn’t expect to get that connected to the storyline and the characters, but I totally did.  I was incredibly invested in Cassie’s relationship with the mysterious Evan Walker and in her search for Sammy, and I hope Yancey continues at the same pace for the rest of the series.  I also think that my connection to this particular story had to do with the overtones of Ender’s Game and The Hunger Games that I saw in The Fifth Wave.  The child soldiers and their training paralleled Card’s Battle School, and Cassie’s determination, grit, and sheer desire to SURVIVE reminded me so much of Katniss.  I found these echoes not to be derivative, rather they just reminded me what was great about those two books and how Yancey was taking familiar sci-fi tropes to a different place.

While I found The Fifth Wave to be an riveting book, I did have two kind of major issues–the use of present tense and the conclusion.  I understand why authors use the present tense; it ratchets up the tension by making the action totally immediate for both the characters and the reader, and it creates an intense narrative pace.  I JUST DON’T LIKE IT.  I feel like I’m sitting watching that part of the Oscars where they’re giving out the award for screenwriting, and they do that bit wherein they read part of the script aloud and show it on the screen.  Few are the present tense books that don’t feel like movie scripts to me, and this book wasn’t one of them.  My other issue (and my friends who have also read it feel the same) is the ending.  I know a series has to have a set up, and the conclusion of the first book has to lead into the next one, blah blah blah.  I just didn’t like it.  I thought it was too tidy and too quick…just not my style.

Another important thing for some of y’all–I thought this book was SCARY.  Like, I read it during the daytime and read something else at night.  I’m a wuss, yes, but if you are too, be advised.  You might also go check out www.thefifthwaveiscoming.com; it’s pretty cool.

Advertisements

Siege and Storm–Leigh Bardugo (June 2013)

*Note–I read t14061955his book as an advance uncorrected proof*

Book 2 in Bardugo’s Grisha Trilogy, Siege and Storm takes readers back to the land of the Grisha a short time after the battle on the Unsea, picking up with Alina and Mal’s journey to get themselves as far away from Ravka as possible, a journey that unfortunately ends when they are discovered and recaptured by the stronger (and more evil) than ever Darkling.  With the help of Sturmhund, a mysterious privateer, Alina escapes from the Darkling and returns to Ravka on a quest to find the other Morozova amplifiers and save the country from civil war.  Struggling with the ambition that comes with growing power, Alina finds new alliances and further troubles in the wake of devastation the Darkling has left behind.

Thoughts I was so excited to win an ARC of this book and then I had to wait over a month to read it! (Grad school and whatnot…) The wait definitely paid off.  All of the wonderful world-building and characterization from Shadow and Bone are present in Siege and Storm, but because it’s the second book in the series there is way, WAY more action.  So much happens in this book and I don’t want to give any of it away (especially since it won’t be out for another month or so), but I will say this–there’s romance, terror on the high seas, deeper and darker magic, swoony guys, and a helluva cliffhanger.  I really liked how much growth Alina experienced over the course of the book, and the relationship struggles she and Mal went through seemed completely realistic and authentic to me.  I also enjoyed learning more about all the court intrigue at the Big Palace, and the introduction of another complicated man into Alina’s life.

My only complaint, and it is very minor, is that I wanted MORE OF THE DARKLING.  He’s my favorite character in the series, although Sturmhund is now a close second, and he doesn’t appear in the flesh as often in this book.  Plus, he’s pretty much the embodiment of pure evil this time around…but I’m still holding out hope that he can be redeemed in book 3.  It could happen–look what JK Rowling did for Draco Malfoy!

Overall, I was extraordinarily pleased with Siege and Storm–it totally lived up to my extremely high expectations.  I think Leigh Bardugo has created such an intricate and fantastical, yet still accessible, world, and her characters are so complex and nuanced.  I can’t wait to see how she wraps it all up in Book 3, but unfortunately it won’t be out until 2014!

PS. I’ve tweeted back and forth with Leigh Bardugo a few times and she is super nice…plus if you follow her on Twitter or Pinterest, she’s always posting cool art and quotes related to the world of Ravka.  FUN.

I Have No Shame (or, Books/Authors Other People Might Be Embarrassed to Admit They Love but I’m Not)

This season on Glee they did a whole episode on “guilty pleasures;” Wham, Phil Collins, Barry Manilow, the Spice Girls…ABBA.  All I could think was, “I’m supposed to be embarrassed about liking these songs????  I love all these songs…because they’re AWESOME.”  Then, two weeks ago, Entertainment Weekly had an article on guilty pleasures, and again, I found myself thinking, “Really?  Seriously?  Some of this stuff is just straight up great.”  That’s when I realized that I have absolutely no shame about things I like…either that, or I have terrible taste.  As usual, the truth is probably somewhere in between.  With that being said, here are some books and authors I unashamedly love, but that other people might term “guilty” pleasures. Me, I say “read away!” ’cause at least you’re reading and not just sitting around picking your nose…

(Most of the books/authors making appearances are from the romance genre…what can I say?  I’m a sucker for a swoony guy and a love story.  AND romance is a highly maligned genre on the whole–I could do a whole post on why people like to hate on a genre that is written almost solely for women…but I won’t.  For the time being.)

1. Laurell K. Hamilton–The Anita Blake Vampire Hunter series (but only through Obsidian Butterfly) and the Merry Gentry Faery series.  I was into vampires and fairies WAY before Twilight or True Blood.  I even wrote a paper freshman year of college (circa 1998) about the evolving depictions of vampires in literature/film…it was called “Sympathy for the Devil.”  That’s right, I titled a paper for a Victorian literature class after a Rolling Stones’ song.  Good times.

2. Jacqueline Carey–The Kushiel’s Chosen trilogy and subsequent companion series.  These books have some crazy kinky 50 Shades of Grey stuff going on in them, but the plot and world-building is so phenomenal.  And Jocelyn, the male protagonist in the first 3 books, is just amazing.  The first book starts really, really slowly because Carey does so much world-building, and the plotting is very intricate and complex, but the payoff is so great. Also, they have maps and an enormous list of the characters at the beginning of each book.  I LOVE MAPS AND CHARACTER LISTS.

3. Diana Gabaldon–The Outlander series.  A ton of people I know adore these books (almost as much as I do), but I still get some funny looks when I’m all, “You should read this!  There’s time travel and hot guys in kilts and Bonnie Prince Charlie and war…it’s amazing!” Also, they’re sometimes shelved under Romance, and a lot of people don’t want to venture into that section of the bookstore/library.  This series is incredibly well-researched and has the best male love interest of all time–JAMIE FRASER.

4. A Knight in Shining Armor, Jude Deveraux–This is another time-travel romance, but it’s way fluffier than Gabaldon’s books.  It is, however, one of the first romances I ever read and is a fun reverse take on A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court.  

5. Anne Rice–Told you I was into vampires…and I don’t like mine to sparkle.  I like ’em scary and with existential crises.  I also think her witch books (The Witching HourLasher, and Taltos) are pretty great.

6. Dan Brown–I read ’em.  I ate that sh*t up.  So did just about everyone else I knew, but now it’s not cool to admit it.  I already told you I have no shame.

7. The Dark Hunter series by Sherrilyn Kenyon.  Swoon.

8. Jodi Picoult–I frequently go through phases with my reading, and I have a tendency to binge read authors.  I’ll read one book, enjoy it, and then I’ll read as many of their other books as I can.  That happened to me with Picoult–I read Plain Truth (about the Amish), thought it was good, then read almost all of her others.  She’s pretty much a formula writer, but when she ventures away from the formula (like in The Tenth Circle) I think she’s a lot better.  Good beach reads.

9. “Chick Lit”–I really hate that term, but since this is a guilty pleasures list, I think it fits pretty well.  Think Meg Cabot’s adult fiction, Sophie Kinsella, Anna Maxted…anything with a fun cover, humor, and a screwed up female protagonist.  I particularly like Maxted’s books, primarily because they’re set in England.  Shallow, I know, but there it is.

10. Katie McAlister–McAlister writes paranormal romance…and has a series where all the male love interests are DRAGONS.  How can you not love that?  Plus, her books are hilarious.

11. Julia Quinn–I love her Regency romances with the Bridgerton family.  Yes, they are totally silly, but the female protagonists are all super smart, and she’s great at describing clothes.

So now I hear people saying, “Lauren, do you only read romance novels with hot guys?” Obviously, the answer is NO…but I have a weak spot for romance because it was the first genre fiction I fell in love with once I graduated from the “Juvenile Fiction” section at the Round Rock Public Library.  There wasn’t a lot of YA back then, and it was all shelved with children’s lit, so I read things like The Outsiders, Stotan!, and Night Kites way earlier than I should have.  After that, all through high school and college, I read romance for fun while I read the canon for my classes.  I think it’s because I’m a super character-driven reader, and since most romance novels have similar plots, the nuance really lies in the characterization.  I don’t really read any mystery fiction (except Laurie R. King’s Kate Martinelli books and Cara Black’s Aimée Léduc series), so that’s why you don’t see any Patricia Cornwell or Sue Grafton on this list.  I don’t read any horror like Dean Koontz or Steven King, either, because I have a seriously over-active imagination and most horror makes me incredibly anxious.  But if that’s your bag, I say more power to you!  I just wanted to make the point that no one should be embarrassed about their reading choices–you’re probably in really good company.  Happy reading!

PS.  If you haven’t read Gabaldon or Carey, you should give them a try.  Honestly.  And don’t be ashamed of it 🙂

My Go-To Recommendations for “Grown-Up” Books

Most of my friends know I’m an obsessive reader, so I get a lot of people asking for book recommendations.  Not all of these people are as enamored with YA lit as I am, and I like to have some “grown-up” books to suggest for them.  I’ve read (and loved) all of these, and they’re books I consider major crowd-pleasers–ones I can recommend without a lot of knowledge about what someone likes to read because just about everyone will like them.

Here goes:

1. The Secret History, Donna TarttSoooo…this is a weird book.  Amazing, but weird.  It’s set at a fictional college in Vermont (based on Bennington College–where my cousin Luke went!) and centers on a group of students who have fashioned themselves into a sort of Bacchanalian cult.  Somebody dies during one of their revels, and the book is a little like a reverse mystery novel.

2. The Thirteenth Tale, Diane Setterfield–The best non-19th century Victorian novel ever.  Even people who hate things like Jane Eyre like this book.  It is also pretty weird.  If you’re already sensing a theme to this list, you’re probably correct.  I’m a weirdo and I like crazy stuff.

3. The Magicians, Lev Grossman–Harry Potter/Narnia for grown-ups.  Seriously.  There’s a wizarding college, and the characters go through a portal into a magical world.  There’s also a sequel, The Magician King, that’s sitting on one of my shelves right now, but I haven’t gotten around to reading it yet.

4. People of the Book, Geraldine Brooks–She won the Pulitzer for March, but I like this one better.  History, religion, war, illuminated manuscripts, book restoration–what more could you ask for?

5. The Time-Traveler’s Wife, Audrey Niffeneger–An epic love story with a time-traveling protagonist.  So beautiful and brutal.  This book ripped my heart out and stomped that sucker flat.

6. Under the Banner of Heaven, Jon Krakauer–Awesome non-fiction that combines a true crime mystery with the history of the Mormon church.

7. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks–More non-fic, this time dealing with the ramifications of poverty, biomedical ethics, and illness.  I’ll be honest, I kind of skipped some of the science-y part to get back to the narrative about Henrietta, but I still think it’s very accessible to the average reader.

8. Friday Night Lights, Buzz Bissinger–The book is SO much better than the movie and totally different from the show.  It is a quintessentially Texas book.  My only complaint is that they talk about the cheerleaders but not the drill team–what Texas high school doesn’t have a drill team?

9. Gone Girl, Gillian Flynn–All the buzz last summer about this book was totally justified.  It’s great and has a killer ending that made me throw the book across the room.

10. The Help, Kathryn Stockett–Yes, there are definitely problematic aspects to this book, but it’s still a great read.  And the movie of this one is actually really good, too.

11. The Lovely Bones, Alice Sebold–Don’t watch the terrible movie.  Read the beautiful book.

I know a lot of folks have already read many of these–there’s a reason they make good, general “You should read THIS” recommendations.  If you haven’t, you should definitely check them out.  Happy reading!

Eleanor and Park–Rainbow Rowell (2013)

tumblr_mku319JDHf1rr0s0uo1_500

Rowell, Rainbow.  Eleanor and Park.  St. Martin’s Griffith, 2013.  336p.  Realistic Fiction (maybe Historical? Are books set in the 1980s considered historical now?)

Set in 1986, Eleanor and Park tells the story of two very different teenagers who discover an extraordinary love in that most ordinary of places–a school bus.  Eleanor is the new girl at school; big, redheaded, with a figure “like a barmaid” (her words), Eleanor has moved back in with her mother, her abusive stepfather, and her four siblings after a year of sleeping on a family friend’s couch.  Park is the local; half-Korean, into music and comic books, forever a member of the almost-popular crowd, Park doesn’t expect anything much to come of having to share his seat on the bus with this unusual newcomer, except maybe a little embarrassment.  Throughout the course of the school year, Eleanor and Park’s relationship deepens from friendship into something much, much bigger, reminding readers of the intensity, absorption, and frequent futility of first love.

Thoughts– I finished this book two days ago, and I’ve been trying to process it ever since.  My thoughts and feelings about it are complex because, on the one hand, I really loved Rowell’s writing style, the setting, the details, and the character of Park; on the other hand, I felt very perplexed by the tone and the character of Eleanor.  I wanted so badly to say, “Home run!  This is a Mary Poppins book* for me!” and I can’t.  What I can do is try to tease out both the stellar qualities and the difficulties I found in Eleanor and Park.

First, the awesome:  Rainbow Rowell is a badass writer.  Her prose is filled with quirky little nuances and references that breathe so much life into the characters and provide little puzzles for the reader if, say, you don’t get the reference.  Also, the setting is incredibly well-done.  A lot of times in realistic YA fiction, the setting is just a backdrop for the story; you don’t really get much world-building.  That is SO not the case here–you feel like Marty McFly gave you his Delorean and plopped you down smack in the middle of Omaha, Nebraska circa 1986.  Every detail of the setting and time period is so pitch-perfect…I vividly remember the perms, frosted lipstick, and music of the 80s, and I think Rowell nails almost everything.  She does a particularly good job with the character of Park; it’s easy to see why Eleanor falls so hard for him.  Park is a complex, achingly real teenage boy, and I especially liked the shifting narrative between the two main characters because it allowed us into his head, something that doesn’t often happen in YA romances. (Usually the entire book is from one or the other partner’s perspective.  While this makes it easy to swoon over great male characters, like Augustus Waters in The Fault in Our Starsit’s nice to see both sides of the story every now and then).

Now for the less awesome:  I have to say, straight up, I just didn’t like Eleanor very much.  I wanted to so, so desperately because I mostly loved the book otherwise, but I just didn’t get her.  At all.  I felt like maybe the reveal as to WHY Eleanor behaved the way she did towards Park in the beginning happened too late in the narrative for me.  Or maybe my lack of experience with the things in Eleanor’s life kept me from connecting with her as a character.  I still am not sure, but I know it cast a shadow over this book for me.  In addition to my difficulties with Eleanor, I had trouble with the overall tone of the book.  I felt this sense of impending doom THE ENTIRE TIME I WAS READING.  I knew an ugly cry was coming for me, and it was like a weight on my brain that I just couldn’t shake.  I kind of thought I was missing something because I had read so many great reviews talking about how wonderful the romance was between Park and Eleanor, but I just couldn’t help thinking to myself, “This is going to end badly.  I just know it” and that kept me at a distance.

By now you’re probably thinking, “Dude. Lauren. Just tell us whether we should read it or not.”  So–you should read it, especially if you like the heartbreaking thing John Green has going on in a lot of his books.  I did very much enjoy Rowell’s writing, and it was fun to be back in a time before Web 2.0 and cell phones and all the tech-y things we have going on today.  Also, I want to say that just because a book is problematic for me doesn’t mean it’s “bad,” per se.  Obviously, it made me think, and that’s always a good thing.  And the sentence-level writing is just so very glorious.  I’m about to read an e-galley of Rainbow Rowell’s upcoming book Fangirl, so I hope to post a glowing review (one where I just adore everything) for that one–I guess we’ll see!

*”practically perfect in every way”…if you don’t get the reference, then your childhood was obviously lacking in coolness.

My All-Time Favorite YA Books…this list goes to ELEVEN.

That’s right, this list goes to 11.  Why, you ask? Because I said so.  (The mom in me obviously comes out to play every now and then…)  Here’s my eleven all-time favorite YA books–each of them is a reread for me.  In the case of some, multiple rereads.  You should read them…because I said so.

1.  Rats Saw God, Rob Thomas (the one who writes Veronica Mars, not the singer)–This book is what would happen if you took My So-Called Life, set it in suburban Texas and made Angela a dude who does a lot of drugs.  Good for those of us with 90s nostalgia and a love of grunge music (there’s even a reference to the death of Kurt Cobain–something I remember SO clearly from HS).

2. Looking for Alaska, John Green–An obvious pick, I know…but I really, really love this book.  I always recommend that people start here instead of The Fault in Our Stars when they want to “see what all the John Green hype” is about.  He won a Printz Award from YALSA for this one, and I think it was well-deserved.  Miles “Pudge” Halter leaves his public school for a private boarding school in rural Alabama where he meets Alaska Young.  All hell breaks loose in Miles’ world.  Prepare yourself for laughter and tears…lots and lots of tears.  Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

3.  The Song of the Lioness Quartet, Tamora Pierce–The first truly YA books I ever read as a kid.  I still re-read them on a regular basis.  Alanna wants to be a knight but, bummer, she’s a girl.  So she switches places with her twin Thom, dresses like a boy, and heads to the palace.  Magic, fighting, swords, and thievery ensue.  Plus, in book 2, she gets the most awesome pet cat EVER.  I just recommend Pierce in general.  I’ve loved each of her series–no one writes better female fantasy protagonists.

4. Dreamland, Sarah Dessen–This is definitely much “darker” than Dessen’s usual YA romances, but it’s hands down my favorite.  Caitlin is such an authentic, flawed teenager, and you just can’t help but root for her, even when you’re screaming “He’s not just a ‘bad boy’!  He’s abusive! And controlling! And getting you involved in drugs!” at her.

5. The Jessica Darling series, Meg McCafferty–Some people say the last 3 books of this series are “new adult” but since I don’t believe that’s actually a thing, I’m gonna say all 5 are YA.  I mean, Anne Shirley gets to grow up, go to college, get a job, have babies, raise them, and send two of them off to war, and we STILL call that series “children’s lit”–can’t Jessica Darling and Marcus Flutie have a happy ending and it still be YA?

6. The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau Banks, E. Lockhart–Feminism, boys, secret societies, basset hounds, Bentham’s panopticon, boarding school.  All these things factor into this awesome, brilliant book.

7.  Beauty Queens, Libba Bray–What if the plane on the TV show “Lost” was filled with teenage beauty pageant contestants?  What if there was a giant conspiracy to kill them all?  What if Miss Texas went native and started running around naked and talking to snakes?  Best satire I’ve ever read.  Hilarious, thought-provoking, and innovative. 

8. Stotan!, Chris Crutcher–Another golden oldie from my younger years.  It’s about a boys on swim team.  In Washington State.  Who do some sort of crazy training program named after the Stoic philosophers and the Spartan warriors.  There is absolutely no reason I should like this book (usually I prefer to ogle swimmers, rather than read about them), but I adore this book.  Crutcher’s writing is so accessible and to the point.  Love all his other books too.

9. Ender’s Game, Orson Scott Card–The only truly science fiction title I love…I just wish OSC’s political and social beliefs weren’t so abhorrent to me.

10. Speak, Laurie Halse Anderson–Melinda doesn’t talk.  Anderson takes you inside her brain to find out why.  (the seasonal structure of this book is wicked awesome…just thought I’d add that)

11. Anything by Meg Cabot.  That’s right–I’ve read ’em all. Cabot’s never going to win a Printz award, but damn.  She writes some compulsively readable books.  Great humor, fun romance, smart girls.  What’s not to love?

So that’s my eleven.  I could think of more, and I’ve certainly read a lot of newer titles that have the potential to make this list, but these are tops today.  Check them out if you haven’t…I think there’s a YA book for just about anybody on this list.

How I Live Now–Meg Rosoff (2004)

Rosoff, Meg.  How I Live Now.  Wendy Lamb Books, 2004.  194p.  Grades 8 and up.  Realistic Fiction.  (2005 Printz Award).

Daisy, a fifteen year old New Yorker, is sent to stay with cousins in the British countryside at the outbreak of World War III.  Just as she is settling into her new life (and a new romance with her cousin Edmond), the cousins receive word that their diplomat mother has been stranded in Oslo due to a bombing and terrorists begin attacking the UK.  Although limited at first to the major British cities, the war soon spreads to the rural areas and Daisy finds herself on a trek for survival with her youngest cousin Piper.  This haunting novel is told in a unique first-person style and presents a terrifying, yet ultimately hopeful, vision of a near-future rent by the destruction of war.

Thoughts- When I first started reading How I Live Now, all I could think was how unrelentingly weird this book was.  I was having a hard time pinning down the main character, and even though I knew it was intentional, I could not for the life of me figure out what was going on with all that first-person, present tense, run-on sentence narration.  Luckily, I pressed on and was rewarded with not just a great adventure story but also a poignant (albeit unusual) love story as well.  That strange narration was indeed showing the reader something important—although I didn’t figure out what until two-thirds of the way through—and as Daisy spent more time amongst her British cousins and the edge of her character was honed by the trauma and hardships of war, I felt like I understood her more and more.

All of this is to say that while the stylistic choices Rosoff makes are often odd, they are purposeful and elevate this story to another literary level.  She takes what could be just another post-apocalyptic, dystopian journey novel and turns it into a poignant examination of family, love, and loyalty in times of great distress.  There is one sticking point to the story, however, and it comes from the romance between Daisy and her first cousin Edmond.  For me, it was at first a little too Flowers in the Attic and incestuous, but by the end of the book, I totally bought how two people so isolated from society and thrown together in such extraordinary circumstances would fall in love, societal mores be damned.  I think it’s a testament to Rosoff’s skill as a writer that their relationship is believable and even something to root for, despite its awkward and possibly unsavory beginnings.

How I Live Now was another Printz winner that seems to have a limited readership—fans of dystopias might pick it up, but it takes a pretty dedicated reader to look past the stylistic quirks and utterly grim storyline to see the beauty and hope of Rosoff’s tale.  Additionally, I find it to be a book for older readers due to its intense themes and details.  I’ve recommended it to several booklovers that I know and no one seems to have had quite the same reaction I did, but I’m going to continue to talk it up anyway because I think it is a really powerful book with important things to say.

 

The Dark Knight Returns–Frank Miller (reprint 2002)

Miller, Frank.  Batman:  The Dark Knight Returns.  DC Comics, 2002.  224p.  Grades 7-12.  Graphic Novel.

Faced with rising crime in a ravaged Gotham City, middle-aged Bruce Wayne makes the decision once again to become the vigilante Batman and to attempt to save Gotham from itself.  Widely considered one of the seminal works of the graphic novel format, The Dark Knight Returns follows Wayne as he faces old foes like Harvey Dent and the Joker and creates alliances with a new Robin and Superman.

Thoughts I wanted to like this book so badly.  I LOVE the Tim Burton and Christopher Nolan movie versions of Batman, and I knew that much of their respective visions came from the Miller comics.  Unfortunately, I just couldn’t get into it—for one thing, I was confused almost the entire time I was reading.  I had such a difficult time figuring out who was speaking, what was happening in real time and what was in the past, and what exactly the storyline was that I almost gave up on reading it altogether.  I did soldier through, however, and though I don’t necessarily feel like I was rewarded for this, I do feel like I gained some insight into the world of comics and why this series is considered to be such a landmark achievement.

In terms of just understanding the comic book world, I felt like I learned how to read the panels more effectively as I struggled through The Dark Knight Returns.  In some ways, comics require a greater level of reader participation than traditional print formats because you have to look at the drawings, figure out which character is speaking in the captions (The Dark Knight Returns doesn’t really have dialogue bubbles like some comics), and synthesize the story all at the same time.  My confusion about which character was which stemmed, I think, from my lack of overall knowledge about the genre in general.  This book panders to no one; either you know who’s whom or you figure it out or you just don’t read any further.  Prior knowledge is expected of the reader, and Miller plows along with his story, with or without you.  I think this demanding quality as well as the high level of ambiguity present in The Dark Knight Returns is what makes this book such a seminal work in comics/graphic novels.  Bruce Wayne/Batman’s ambivalence about his behavior and his situation, the fine line between heroism and vigilantism, the role of the government in “helping” citizens—these are much deeper themes than what the general public expects from a comic book.  I can definitely see how Frank Miller paved the way for sophisticated narratives in graphic novels, like Neil Gaiman’s Sandman series or Joss Whedon’s illustrated continuation of his “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” saga, and opened the eyes of many naysayers who just saw comics as “kid stuff.”

The Dark Knight Returns definitely has a teen audience, but I question how wide of a readership that audience actually is, primarily because I found this book to require so much background knowledge.  Teens with a pre-existing interest in comics or graphic novels will really enjoy it, and it might work well in the classroom if you were doing a graphic novel unit or (even better) teaching a content-area elective on the graphic novel format.

Moonbird–Phillip Hoose (2012)

Hoose, Phillip.  Moonbird.  Farrar Strauss Giroux, 2012.  160p.  Grades 4 and up.  Non-fiction.  (2013 Sibert Honor Book).

This non-fiction work combines narrative and informative styles to tell the migratory story of B-95, aka “Moonbird,” and the plight of his shorebird species, the rufa red knot.  Alternating between the almost adventure-like tale of B-95’s migration from Tierra del Fuego to the Arctic and back and an examination of the complex ecological reasons behind the diminishing numbers of red knots, this book holds readers’ attentions and provides them with both a fast-paced narrative to follow and well-researched facts to learn.  Also included in the text are character studies of various scientists and conservationists important to the study of red knots, particularly the long-lived B-95.

Thoughts- I found this little book, in a word, charming.  If that seems a strange adjective to attach to a non-fiction book about shorebirds, well, maybe it is, but it is also the perfect way to describe this story of the Moonbird and his cross-hemispheric migratory travels.  I was completely sucked into the story of this little bird and the plight of his fellow red knots in their struggle to survive against the odds of nature and the meddling of man.  With no dialogue and only a few pictures, Hoose makes B-95 a real character with only a modicum of anthropomorphism.  He also carefully outlines the science and technology behind the tracking of shorebirds around the world and explains to the novice birder the unique ecological requirements of the red knot and the reasons for its diminished population.  Character studies of the scientists who study shorebirds are interspersed amongst the chapters and provide human faces to attach to the quest to save the red knot.

The wide age range of readership for this book seems to be one of its best qualities.  I can see animal enthusiasts as young as 10 or 11 eating it up, but I also think the sophisticated science discussions and balanced approach to ecosystems work well for readers of all ages, including adults.  Like any good non-fiction book, Moonbird has solidly researched facts and is filled with fascinating information about its subject.  From the shores of Tierra del Fuego to the horseshoe crab-strewn Delaware Bay to the remote reaches of the Arctic, Moonbird takes its readers on the unforgettable journey B-95 and his flockmates make year after year in their biological quest to perpetuate the species.

 

In Darkness–Nick Lake (2012)

Lake, Nick.  In Darkness.  Bloomsbury, 2012.  352p.  Grades 9 and up.  Realistic/Historical Fiction.  (2013 Printz Award).

Fifteen year old Shorty is recovering from a gang-related gun shot wound in a Haitian hospital when the devastating earthquake of January 2010 hits.  Toussaint L’Ouverture is the fifty-four year old leader of Haiti’s eighteenth century slave rebellion.  The lives of these two men and the fate of the country they love are intertwined in an intoxicating mix of history, voodoo, brutality, and hope to create this complex and nuanced novel about the power of place, individuality, and joy in the midst of tragedy.

Thoughts-   This was the last book I read for the semester and I thought there was absolutely no way it could possibly be better or more deserving of accolades than Elizabeth Wein’s Code Name Verity.  I was wrong (I enjoyed Verity more, but I ended up thinking In Darkness was the better book).  In Darkness is maybe the best example of interwoven narrators that I’ve ever read…and that’s saying a lot because I was really crazy about John Corey Whaley’s work in Where Things Come Back.  The transitions between Shorty and Toussaint are so smooth and the connection between the two narrators so imaginatively established that I didn’t even need the “Then/Now” chapter tags to discern what was going on—it all seemed completely seamless and logical to me.  I loved how Lake set up laid all the groundwork for readers to understand modern and historic Haitian religion, culture, and language and then linked those two time-periods together through the characters of Shorty and Toussaint.  I also loved how much I learned about modern Haiti (beyond just what I saw on the news post-earthquake) and about the 18th century slave rebellion (I knew L’Ouverture’s name but that was about it)—both men’s stories were so fascinating and finely drawn.

My one real criticism of the book is the lack of translation.  I read French but while Haitian Kreyole has its roots in French, it is a different beast altogether.  Lake does some paraphrase for the reader—he’ll write something in Kreyole and then give a brief description of what was said—but some of the words and phrases are never translated.  Some of these have enough context clues or appear often enough to discern their meaning (“anpil” and “moun” spring to mind), but many remained completely indecipherable to me.  I think some footnotes or a glossary would really have helped out a lot, and I know teens would struggle with the language as well.  Other than that and the somewhat hard sell of the L’Ouverture storyline, I think In Darkness has a lot of characteristics that make it really appealing to teens—it centers on an event in recent memory, it references musicians and pop culture touchstones teens will be familiar with, and it moves along at a ripping pace.  Despite my initial misgivings, I definitely ended up seeing why the Printz committee deemed it the most distinguished writing for young adults in 2012.